14 Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons. Student athletes should be treated the same as other university students. 8. Of course, no one consistently participating in a team sport is blind to this one. 14 Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons. 1 March 2016. Excerpt. Student loan debt in the United States exceeds $1.5 trillion. Cons: The cons far outweigh the pros. The extension in 2016 followed a 2010 contract which offered a 14-year agreement to broadcast the annual tournament for $10.8 billion. By. Many university students are struggling financially to support their education. This has been the topic of argument that have swayed the minds of fans and General Managers alike. Pros and Cons of Paying Student Athletes. Why, They Already Are — Sports . The U.S. Supreme Court will soon review that decision, which paves the way for athletes to receive greater benefits such as "graduate school scholarships, study abroad opportunities, or computers.". This money is spread through administrators, athletic directors, coaches, and media outlets. Editor's Note: This story appeared in the December 2015 ORANGE Issue IV. Login or Subscribe. It attracts talent. Tuition-free college will help decrease crippling student debt. Pros: The ruling is a massive win for student athletes, of course. Athletes in college are put through the same grueling training, same intense and jarring hits, and always present risk of injury that professionals go through. 14 Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons. The extension in 2016 followed a 2010 contract which offered a 14-year agreement to broadcast the annual tournament for $10.8 billion. This will not tie the students to debts that will take them half their lives to pay. Toggle Navigation. So let's at least try to keep it that way. Another benefit of paying college athletes is that it could help teach the basics of personal finances to athletes, many of whom have dealt with very public . why college athletes should be paid outline, a hook for college athletes being paid, college athletes getting paid, should college athletes be paid persuasive essay, argumentative essay paying college athletes, paying college athletes essay, should college athletes be paid thesis, paying college athletes pros and cons Start-Up allows for certifications and so drivers without offense, Mr. These intangible skills will come in handy after graduation, when it's time to launch your career. Most traditionalists would also argue that college sports exist not so the athletes could gain profit, but to foster the true meaning of sportsmanship between colleges. Whether or not college athletes should be paid is a huge controversy in today's society and includes many pros and cons. The results from the growing fan population has increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). 7. 'Should college athletes be paid' pros and cons. "NCAA Won't Budge On Paying College Athletes . Despite the above reasons, critics believe college athletes should not be paid. Amateurism in sports can be defined as not accepting money for their performance and activity while governed by a regulatory body. In 2016, CBS and Turner Broadcasting extended their contact with the NCAA Division 1 basketball tournament with an 8-year, $8.8 billion extension. Not only would those things affect your athleticism, they could also have a negative effect on your academics. The extension in 2016 followed a 2010 contract which offered a 14-year agreement to broadcast the annual tournament for $10.8 billion. Sports help the students learn various aspects of life such as teamwork and, tolerance. Tangible recognition of the risks. Paying college athletes for their participation in sports eliminates the need for them to find outside employment to support themselves. This was quite a change from polling conducted in 2017, when 60% believed college scholarships were enough compensation for college athletes. Below are a few potential pros and cons of paying college athletes. Works Cited Dorfman, Jeffrey. Paying athletes would eliminate the need for additional employment. 1. The Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes Essay 660 Words | 3 Pages. 0. Answer: Your question almost answers itself if you look at All the sports that are played by the NCAA and also the additional sports that are played by the eight colleges of The Ivy Athletic League (which has No scholarships for anyone, but provides up to and including full financial assistance f. A 2019 Seton Hall Sports Poll found that 60% of those surveyed agreed that college athletes should be allowed compensation for their name, image, and/or likeness, while 32% disagreed, and 8% were unsure. 09 Dec. 2013. Pros of Paying College Athletes They Put Their Health On The Line Football isn't a sport for the weak. You cannot pay players without invoking Title IX. Many scholarships may offer tuition, room, and board coverage in return for participating in a sport, but not every student-athlete qualifies for a scholarship. Treating college players like pros would encourage them to follow the same high standard of moral conduct as professional athletes. Health-wise, along with the pro of staying in shape, comes increased risk of injury. Pro April 17, 2022. This was quite a change from polling conducted in 2017, when 60% believed college scholarships were enough compensation for college athletes. College sports have grown enormously in the eyes of sports fans over the years. I am John and I've been a part of the athletic team of my college. By paying student athletes, schools are treating them like pros, encouraging them to continue the kind of dedication and perseverance when they become professionals. According to Michael Wilbon of ESPN said that the NCAA signed a contract with CBS Sports that spans from 2011-2024 and costed the NCAA $10.8 billion. Academic integrity might be the first . Scholarships might pay for books, tuition, and the other common costs of going to college, but they don't pay every expense that a student might have. The reason why student athletes are not currently paid, according to the NCAA, is that it would eliminate the separation between amateurism and professionalism in sports. A 2019 Seton Hall Sports Poll found that 60% of those surveyed agreed that college athletes should be allowed compensation for their name, image, and/or likeness, while 32% disagreed, and 8% were unsure. The extension in 2016 followed a 2010 contract which offered a 14-year agreement to broadcast the annual tournament for $10.8 billion. 14 Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons. Many believe that scholarships cover the fact that college athletes don't get paid. Also defensive coordinator Jeremy Pruitt and offensive coordinator Brian Daboll were both paid over $1million. [ 1] [ 2] The average 2016 graduate owed $37,172 in . This is how college athletes feel right now. So instead of being single-minded we need to look at the big picture when we make the decision about paying college athletes. The Cons of Paying College Athletes. Www.usnews.com. Walk-on players have their images used to generate revenues for the NCAA too for zero compensation. Besides, this romantic idea of student athletes is what makes college sports so great. 1. List of the Cons of Paying College Athletes 1. Table Of Contents. Why do college athletes that put in just as much work get paid differently? According to Jacob Peter and Business Insider, "Collegiate student-athletes may spend more than 40 hours a week practicing, leaving . Many scholarships may offer tuition, room, and board coverage in return for participating in a sport, but not . This topic has been debated for many years and is still being debated. There are only few money maker sports like men's and women's basketball. Some commentators worry that pay-to-play rules would diminish the spirit of amateurism in college athletics. They already have many added perks that put them ahead of other pupils. Here Are Some Pros and Cons — HuffPost. A 2019 Seton Hall Sports Poll found that 60% of those surveyed agreed that college athletes should be allowed compensation for their name, image, and/or likeness, while 32% disagreed, and 8% were unsure. Other Resources: College Athletes Getting Paid? Essay Guides; Free Essays; Research Paper Examples . 14 . The essay discusses both the pros and cons of paying college athletes. It will pave the way for students to pay off their loans as soon as they finish college. The extension in 2016 followed a 2010 contract which offered a 14-year agreement to broadcast the annual tournament for $10.8 billion. When there is a heated debate on should college athletes be paid pros and cons, supporters of salaries for college athletes argue that, college scholarships, though propagated by schools and colleges to be sufficient for students, is not always plentiful for them. A potential end to the seedy underbelly of college sports. It encourages healthier student athletes. Payment during college would help some people support their family and also encourage them to get a college degree before leaving for a professional career. Web. These players, most of whom are gunning the major leagues, can be seriously hurt at any point during practice or games. They're Already Paid Up To $125,000 Per Year." Forbes.Forbes Magazine, 29 Aug. 2013. Web. List of Pros of Paying College Athletes 1. According to a 2017 NCAA survey. Against Paying NCAA football players. A Way to Start Paying College Athletes. 0 0. That contract will pay the NCAA about $830 million dollars per year. The main argument in favor of paying college athletes is that they bring in a large net amount of revenue to their schools. 14 Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons The extension in 2016 followed a 2010 contract which offered a 14-year agreement to broadcast the annual tournament for $10.8 billion. So, unless they receive full scholarships, college athletes have to worry about where they'll get money for tuition and other university fees as well as for their room . Paying College Athletes. Between practice and games you're at risk daily for everything from minor sprains to broken bones to concussions. It would eliminate the line between amateur and professional sports. Beyond the physical, another one of the disadvantages of being a student-athlete is that there isn't a whole lot of study time. Pro: Paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness. Con: Increased Risk of Injury. The NCAA and Federal Antitrust Law. Here Are Some Pros And Cons.", Hiring managers often look for participation in activities . Not paying college athletes can be taken as exploitation by schools and colleges. The solutions that offer the most benefit to college athletes involve rolling back on the all . 4. Practical acknowledgment of the long odds of making it to the pros. The reason is only a few sports bring in money. The pros of paying college athletes is college athletes would be able to provide for their family, and they would be able to pay for hospital cost just in case of a serious injury. Compensating college athletes could also reduce the corruption within collegiate athletics. College athletes are risking their bodies as well as their future careers and earning potential to play for colleges and universities while often receiving a sub-par education. Pros: Why college athletes should be paid. The Pros of Paying College Athletes In this age where social media is the king, making a profit out of sports is even a more ludicrous pursuit. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes roughly $1 billion in income annually and the athletes do not receive any of it. WVadmin - November 2, 2019. The NCAA states that 90% of the revenues generated through the games played by student athletes go into services, programs, or direct distribution opportunities . College athletes would be often drawn into corruption by agents and boosters who are willing to bribe them to play for other schools. Have you ever wondered if a college athlete should or shouldn't get paid? Removal of the exploitation factor. It gives student athletes a much-needed income. After making billions and billions of dollars for universities, players being compensated is an obvious, fair decision and should have happened a long time ago. Since college athletes give up endless amounts of time, bring attention to the schools, and will prepare the athletes for the pros, college athletes should be paid. 0. Buy Full Issue $19.95. The college students are passed their teenage and just entered the period of young age. NCAA eyes rules clarity on athlete pay in June. 14 Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons. Please Share Facebook; Twitter; . Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros and Cons It Encourages Healthier Student-Athletes. Everyone is aware that teams pay some athletes to come to their school and play a sport.